Hi WebNewser readers - we're now a part of mediabistro's SocialTimes.com, bringing you breaking news, guides & tips from the Web world.
Social Media

Nearly two-thirds of respondents to a weeklong Mediabistro poll on paywalls predicted that charging for online content would spell doom for newspapers. Another 20% said paywalls wouldn’t make a meaningful difference.

In other words, 85% of the 1,682 participants apparently think News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch‘s belligerent vow to charge for online content starting next year is tantamount to publisher-assisted suicide.

Of course, Murdoch isn’t the only publisher considering a paywall — just the loudest. Newsday recently began charging non-print subscribers, and the New York Times also is mulling over a fee-based online subscription.

The specific question we asked was, “Do you think paywalls will save newspapers?” Here are the specific options offered and what percentage of the vote each got:

65% — No, in fact it’ll be the beginning of the end as readers flee to other free sources.

20% — No, it’ll generate some revenue but won’t make a meaningful difference.

12% — Yes, making readers pay will generate the revenue newspapers need to stay afloat.

3% — Other

No, I have no idea what “other” could be either. The crowd can be an enigma that way.

PaywallPollResults.gif

Top Stories
Social Media
Mediabistro Events
EVENTS
AllFacebook Marketing Conference returns to San Francisco on June 28-29! Join us and get a how-to guide for marketing to Facebook’s 800 million users. A full agenda will be announced soon. Keep an eye on our event site for more information. Special early pricing is available for only $249 until this Wednesday, February 15, so register today.