Nearly two-thirds of respondents to a weeklong Mediabistro poll on paywalls predicted that charging for online content would spell doom for newspapers. Another 20% said paywalls wouldn’t make a meaningful difference.
In other words, 85% of the 1,682 participants apparently think News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch‘s belligerent vow to charge for online content starting next year is tantamount to publisher-assisted suicide.
Of course, Murdoch isn’t the only publisher considering a paywall — just the loudest. Newsday recently began charging non-print subscribers, and the New York Times also is mulling over a fee-based online subscription.
The specific question we asked was, “Do you think paywalls will save newspapers?” Here are the specific options offered and what percentage of the vote each got:
65% — No, in fact it’ll be the beginning of the end as readers flee to other free sources.
20% — No, it’ll generate some revenue but won’t make a meaningful difference.
12% — Yes, making readers pay will generate the revenue newspapers need to stay afloat.
3% — Other
No, I have no idea what “other” could be either. The crowd can be an enigma that way.












SocialTimes.com Twitter feed loading...
Neil Vidyarthi
Devon Glenn
Staff Writer
Megan O'Neill
Web Video Writer
Nadine Cheung
The Job Post
![[All Facebook Stats: Facebook Analytics for Your Business]](/blogshare/content/images/stpro_allfacebookstats.gif)
![[How can Facebook change your business?]](/blogshare/content/images/FMB_A_MAY2011_336x100_F.gif)


