<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="http://www.mediabistro.com/common_v4/xsl/content.xsl"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
<title>Legal - SocialTimes</title>
<link>http://socialtimes.com</link>
<description>Your Social Media Source</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 03:37:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<atom:link href="http://socialtimes.com/tag/legal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>

<item>
<title>Oops! Android Vendors May Have Lost Their Linux Distribution Rights</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://socialtimes.com/files/2011/04/fragmented_android.png" alt="" title="fragmented_android" width="240" height="274" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-55773" />Android, which owns about half the market share for smartphones has been in the new lately because of the various patent purchases involving Apple, Microsoft and Google defensively buying from (what used to be) Novell, Nortel, IBM and other sources. However, FOSS Patents reports that there is an even more important item that may create a big problem for Android.<br />
 <a href="http://socialtimes.com/oops-android-vendors-may-have-lost-their-linux-distribution-rights_b74249#more-74249" class="more-link">continued&#8230;</a></p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Todd Ogasawara</dc:creator>
<comments>http://socialtimes.com/oops-android-vendors-may-have-lost-their-linux-distribution-rights_b74249#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://socialtimes.com/oops-android-vendors-may-have-lost-their-linux-distribution-rights_b74249</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialtimes.com/?p=74249</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPLv2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ThinkMobile]]></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NLRB: Some Employees&#8217; Online Rants Cross the Line</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-70899" title="wassom" src="http://socialtimes.com/files/2011/07/wassom.png" alt="" width="200" height="200" /><em>Brian D. Wassom is a litigation attorney in Southeast Michigan whose practice focuses on copyright, trademark, publicity rights, media law, and related subject matter. Brian blogs about the law of social and emerging media on <a href="http://www.wassom.com/" target="_blank">Wassom.com</a> and invites you to join his Twitter conversation on <a href="http://www.twitter.com/bdwassom" target="_blank">@bdwassom</a>.</em></p>
<p><em> </em>As <a href="http://socialtimes.com/employee-social-media-rights_b70895" target="_blank">I’ve previously discussed</a>, the National Labor Relations Board has taken the stance in several recent cases that employees’ griping about their employers in social media sites was “concerted activity” protected by federal labor laws. Many people have felt that those cases set a disturbing precedent and overly restricted employers’ ability to protect their reputations from being damaged by their own employees.</p>
<p> <a href="http://socialtimes.com/nlrb-some-employees-online-rants-cross-the-line_b73263#more-73263" class="more-link">continued&#8230;</a></p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Neil Glassman</dc:creator>
<comments>http://socialtimes.com/nlrb-some-employees-online-rants-cross-the-line_b73263#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://socialtimes.com/nlrb-some-employees-online-rants-cross-the-line_b73263</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialtimes.com/?p=73263</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Wassom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLRB]]></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 13:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Feds Raise Questions About Employee Social Media Rights</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-70899" title="wassom" src="http://socialtimes.com/files/2011/07/wassom.png" alt="" width="200" height="200" /><em>Brian D. Wassom is a litigation attorney in Southeast Michigan whose practice focuses on copyright, trademark, publicity rights, media law, and related subject matter. Brian blogs about the law of social and emerging media on <a href="http://www.wassom.com/" target="_blank">Wassom.com</a> and invites you to join his Twitter conversation on <a href="http://www.twitter.com/bdwassom" target="_blank">@bdwassom</a>.</em></p>
<p>The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) caused a stir in October 2010 by filing its first enforcement action related to social media.</p>
<p> <a href="http://socialtimes.com/employee-social-media-rights_b70895#more-70895" class="more-link">continued&#8230;</a></p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Neil Glassman</dc:creator>
<comments>http://socialtimes.com/employee-social-media-rights_b70895#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://socialtimes.com/employee-social-media-rights_b70895</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialtimes.com/?p=70895</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRLB]]></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>5 Social Media Lessons for Company Legal Departments</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="/files/2011/03/court.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-42598" src="/files/2011/03/court-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>When you&#8217;re trying to get your <a title="Corporate blog" href="http://www.socialtimes.com/tag/corporate-blog">corporate blog</a> or <a title="Social media marketing" href="http://www.socialtimes.com/tag/social-media-marketing">social media marketing</a> initiative off the ground, you can expect the lawyers involved. This is especially true if you work for a highly regulated company (such as telecom, financial services or life sciences/health care). In any company, risk is always a serious concern, and the threat of litigation can overshadow even concerns about competitive intelligence. And, let&#8217;s be realistic: the legal team is likely to be a skittish bunch.</p>
<p> <a href="http://socialtimes.com/5-social-media-lessons-for-company-legal-departments_b42596#more-42596" class="more-link">continued&#8230;</a></p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Tom Johansmeyer</dc:creator>
<comments>http://socialtimes.com/5-social-media-lessons-for-company-legal-departments_b42596#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://socialtimes.com/5-social-media-lessons-for-company-legal-departments_b42596</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=42596</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ConsumerBell Looks To Crowdsource Corporate Accountability</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/files/2010/05/consumer-bell.png" alt="ConsumerBell Logo" width="200" height="160" align='right' />Did Comcast just rake you over the coals and double the cost of your cable, internet, and television?  You aren&#8217;t alone and ConsumerBell is here to protect you.  No matter what company has potentially hurt you, consumers are the ones who should have control.  By letting consumers join together, <a href='http://www.consumerbell.com' target='_blank'>ConsumerBell</a> looks to help those who have been mistreated by corporations and hold them accountable.<br />
 <a href="http://socialtimes.com/consumerbell-looks-to-crowdsource-corporate-accountability_b13682#more-13682" class="more-link">continued&#8230;</a></p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Nick O'Neill</dc:creator>
<comments>http://socialtimes.com/consumerbell-looks-to-crowdsource-corporate-accountability_b13682#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://socialtimes.com/consumerbell-looks-to-crowdsource-corporate-accountability_b13682</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=13682</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 12:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Supreme Court Is Ill-Equipped To Handle Tech And Social Media Related Cases</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.allfacebook.com/images/legal-icon.gif' align='right' alt='-Law Icon-' />Justice John Paul Stevens just <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/04/obama-marks-stevens-90th-birth.html?wprss=44">turned 90 years old</a> on Tuesday.  As an aging member of society, it is no wonder that he and some of his fellow justices have no idea what certain new technologies are, how they are different from each other, why we need them, etc.  But since, as members of the high court, they are the final word on justice in America, does it make sense that these men and women lack a basic understanding of just the beginning of a slew of technical issues likely to come before them in the next few years?<br />
 <a href="http://socialtimes.com/supreme-court-is-ill-equipped-to-handle-tech-and-social-media-related-cases_b11347#more-11347" class="more-link">continued&#8230;</a></p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Dani Manor</dc:creator>
<comments>http://socialtimes.com/supreme-court-is-ill-equipped-to-handle-tech-and-social-media-related-cases_b11347#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://socialtimes.com/supreme-court-is-ill-equipped-to-handle-tech-and-social-media-related-cases_b11347</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=11347</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Unvarnished: The Evil Side of Social Media?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/files/2010/03/unvarnished.jpg" alt="Unvarnished Logo" width="200" height="160" align="right" />Remember that time when you had a very vocal disagreement with someone at work, or with a client, and you hoped it would go away and time would heal any rifts or at least neutralize them? Well that might not happen if people were to abuse a site like Unvarnished. Did something not so professional that peeved someone? Messed up a big project? All that information might just appear on Unvarnished, courtesy of some &#8220;anonymous&#8221; posting.<br />
 <a href="http://socialtimes.com/unvarnished-the-evil-side-of-social-media_b4901#more-4901" class="more-link">continued&#8230;</a></p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Raj Dash</dc:creator>
<comments>http://socialtimes.com/unvarnished-the-evil-side-of-social-media_b4901#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://socialtimes.com/unvarnished-the-evil-side-of-social-media_b4901</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=4901</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unvarnished]]></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>RockYou&#039;s Data Breach Takes A Turn For The Worse With Class Action Suit</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p style='text-align:center'>
<img src='http://www.socialtimes.com/images/rockyou-logo.gif' alt='-RockYou Logo-' />
</p>
<p>RockYou has come under fire recently after a SQL injection flaw resulted in a data breach which exposed over 32 million RockYou user emails and passwords.  Rather than immediately solving the problem however, RockYou was complacent.  As Nik Cubrilovic <a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/14/rockyou-hack-security-myspace-facebook-passwords/'>pointed out</a>, &#8220;They have not taken steps to rectify the problems that caused the breach and have not addressed their users in a suitable or adequate manner. An appropriate response would have been to take the site down for a period of a few hours and enforce that users enter new passwords, which would be stored in a hashed or encrypted form.&#8221;  Two weeks later a class action has been filed.<br />
 <a href="http://socialtimes.com/rockyous-data-breach-takes-a-turn-for-the-worse-with-class-action-suit_b1545#more-1545" class="more-link">continued&#8230;</a></p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Nick O'Neill</dc:creator>
<comments>http://socialtimes.com/rockyous-data-breach-takes-a-turn-for-the-worse-with-class-action-suit_b1545#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://socialtimes.com/rockyous-data-breach-takes-a-turn-for-the-worse-with-class-action-suit_b1545</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=1545</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RockYou]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Who Will Protect the Children?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>So, the latest thing is age-verification for minors, where sites like MySpace and Facebook confirm the identities of members under 18 and restrict access only to other children or parent-approved adults.  Sounds good and solves a basic online security problem, and a big one at that, right?</p>
<p>Well, yes and no.  As <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/16/business/16ping.html?partner=rss"> the New York Times reported last week</a>, &#8220;Online Age Verification for Children Brings Privacy Worries&#8221; since the cost of doing this kind of business can be kind of steep  &#8211;  at least under current proposals.  The Times discussed one company in particular, <a href="http://www.eguardian.com/">eGuardian of Ontario, CA</a>, which &#8220;asks a parent to submit the birth date, address, school and gender of a child, then it asks schools to confirm the information.&#8221;<br />
 <a href="http://socialtimes.com/who-will-protect-the-children_b948#more-948" class="more-link">continued&#8230;</a></p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>andrewmirsky</dc:creator>
<comments>http://socialtimes.com/who-will-protect-the-children_b948#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://socialtimes.com/who-will-protect-the-children_b948</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=948</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy and Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

